Beverages with bite: how to process drinks with particles

Beverage Heat transfer

Beverages with bite: how to process drinks with particles

Can you bite a beverage? You can if it contains chewy cubes made from coconut. One of the latest trends in Asia is to add nata de coco (jelly-like fermented cubes of coconut water) to juices. It is part of a global trend to make beverages chunkier, thicker and more nutritious. This is opening up new opportunities – but also creating new challenges for beverage processors.

Beverages are becoming more of a mouthful. The dividing line between foods and beverages is becoming blurred with the global trend towards adding more and bigger particles to beverages. But how do you process these drinks so that the delicate particles don’t suffer damage or maceration?

The expanding market for beverages with particles (as well as fibres and pulp) is putting new demands on processors and the technologies they use to deliver high-quality products. This is because these constituents are often fragile and easily damaged during processing.

Beverage processors have traditionally worked with pulp and fibres, but particles have become more popular ingredients in the last decade, and the trend is expected to continue.

Consumers are increasingly looking for enhanced, exciting, refreshing drinks with the trend accelerating towards keeping natural fruit fibres in the beverages – or mixing particles or pulp into them. This trend is prevalent in parts of Asia. For example in China, nata de coco (chunks of jelly-like coconut water) is added to juice and pieces of Aloe vera to ice tea. The idea is to create products where consumers experience the feeling of drinking fruit in liquid form or even perceive drinking a beverage as like having a snack. In other words, consumers are looking for more than ‘just’ a beverage.

Ask yourself this

A number of considerations have to be taken into account when processing beverages with particles, fibres and pulp: How much damage is acceptable? Where in the process is the damage most likely to occur, and can something be done about it? How do variations, such as ripeness or sugar content in the raw material, affect the process and the product? How does the equipment – the pumps, valves, heat exchangers – influence the final product?

Tetra Pak has delivered numerous installations to beverage producers, including those handling particles such as Aloe vera, nata de coco and peach pieces. One of the best solutions, if the investment can be justified, is to have an aseptic dual line: one line for the particle stream and one for the liquid stream. Then they are blended continuously inline or in an aseptic tank before filling. In this way, the particle stream containing a minimum of liquid can be treated in an optimal way for the particles, while the liquid stream can be optimized separately. Of course, particles, fibres and pulp require longer heating time than the liquid.

“With heat treatment, you need to ensure a certain temperature for food safety. The main challenge is that food with particles has two phases: a liquid phase and a particle phase,” says Helena Arph, Technology Specialist, Viscous and Particulate Foods at Tetra Pak. “The challenge is to achieve the right temperature in the centre of the particle without overheating the liquid, because it takes greater heat and a longer time to heat the particle than the liquid. That’s why a dual line is a good solution when product quality is a top priority.”

For particles, heat exchangers should be designed with fewer – but larger – tubes of sufficient diameter with smooth inlets. The larger the particle, the larger the tube diameters needed.

Getting the size of the heat transfer surface right requires accurate tools based on the correct heat-transfer coefficients. Calculations should take into account the fact that the presence of particles actually increases the mixing in the tubes, due to turbulence.

“We have cracked the heat transfer code,” says Arph, referring to new calculation tools including PartCalc. “We have built and validated heat-transfer tools that can be used for optimal design for foods or beverages with particles.”

Having trouble watching this video? Watch it here.

Want to know more about Tetra Pak’s research?

New findings from a Tetra Pak research group indicate that we may be over-pasteurizing some of our drinking juices – and wasting energy, money and time in the process. The group’s findings show that the pasteurization recommendations can be optimized while retaining product quality. Get your white paper on juice pasteurization and learn more!


Related reading:

Separators and sustainability: how the right equipment can reduce the dairy industry’s climate impact
The science of separation
A brief history of separation
Separate wheys: the role of separators in today’s consumer trends
Why cold milk separation is hot again
Watch Your Speed – Tetra Pak® Homogenizer 250
It’s not you, it’s me – Tetra Pak® Homogenizer 250
4 things to look for in a homogenizer
Devils and details – the technologies you need for great spreadable cheese
Spreading knowledge: everything you need to know about mayonnaise production
How to control the cost of mayonnaise and cold emulsion production
The great mayonnaise controversy
3 global food trends and the challenges they pose for mayonnaise producers
4 tips to help you choose the right high shear mixer
High shear mixing reduces the cost of mayonnaise production
How to achieve high-quality mayonnaise
New mixer paves way for geographical and portfolio expansion
How a regional beauty producer saved $70,500 on energy costs
A short history of mixing – from mortar and pestle to microns
The heat exchanger budget dilemma: why project and operational managers disagree
Product-to-product tubular heat exchangers: surprisingly versatile
New heat exchanger welding technique meets 3-A Standard
Quantum leap: the secret to optimum heat exchanger configuration
Buying and owning a Tetra Pak® Tubular Heat Exchanger is child’s play
The digital future of dairies: automation and its effects
Four health trends and how your homogenizer can help you capitalize on them
Common quality issues homogenizers solve
A day in the life of a super-efficient dairy separator
What on Earth do separators have to do with space travel?
Infographic: faster, greener skin care cream manufacturing
How airtight separators help solve the coconut challenge
Why standard steel won’t suffice for dairy separators
Do you need help to navigate the mayonnaise maze?
Why two-stage homogenization is best for tomato products
Fine-tune your homogenizer to boost quality of tomato products
The magic inside our tubular heat exchangers
Cook and grind: from rock-hard beans to paste in 15 minutes
How to choose the right mixing and blending process
Simulation and its role in improving your product quality
How to streamline production for formulated UHT dairy products
2 common powder mixing challenges – and how to solve them
Mixing: where ingredients become products
Reduce total cost of ownership for recombined milk processing by 30%
Yoghurt is booming – here is the best way to mix it
4 steps to perfect blending – with optimal yield and minimal losses
5 questions that hold the secret to the perfect product
How to scale up sauce production
Finished syrup production: success is sweet
How to dissolve sugar safely, economically and reliably
Continuous benefits: 4 reasons to consider in-line blending
Cunning innovation makes a stir in the soft-drink world
Beverages with bite: how to process drinks with particles
How to design the optimal heat exchanger setup for your needs
Minimize your food safety risks with floating protection system
Viscous products and heat transfer: 5 things to think about
Corrosion: how to prevent an everyday risk becoming a problem
Infographic – A brief history of heating food
5 troubleshooting tips for tubular heat exchangers
How to make better soup – with mathematics
Infographic – Food heat transfer basics
Lower your operating costs with preventive maintenance
How to choose the right heat exchanger
Case closed: the magic inside airtight separators
Reduce your pressure – reduce your energy costs
How to ensure separation enhances value in whey production
How a Bactofuge unit restored one dairy’s market share
Clarification: 5 things you need to know
Bacto basics: how to achieve top-quality dairy products
3 tips for keeping your separator clean
Film: the basics of separation in 1 minute
4 important questions about NIZO
Condition monitoring: everything’s under control
The importance of centrifugal separation for product quality
Why an airtight separator is best for product quality
How to achieve high-quality tea through separation
The basic workings of milk homogenization
Homogenizing lactic acid drinks: 4 things to know
The joy of soy: homogenization challenges and solutions
Wanted: a quick lab method for assessing RNGS shelf-life stability
Homogenization: the secret to longer life
Homogenization: what you need to know
9 ways homogenization improves beverage quality
The ketchup effect
How a dairy solved the problem of excessive creaming
Five tips for avoiding common homogenization mistakes
Why a tiny gap makes a big difference for homogenization
How to choose the right piston for your application
How a dairy giant cut CIP energy costs by up to 10%
3 things you need to know about the compressed air for your separator
Video: Best value homogenization in the long run
Discover the benefits of cold milk separation
Homogenizer guide: what to consider for minimum TCO
Good quality water improves separator lifetime and performance: 5 important facts
The secret to large homogenizer cost savings
The cream of the crop: how the separator sparked a dairy revolution
Five reasons to choose an airtight separator
7 things to know about separators
Homogenizer total cost of ownership: what you need to know
How to produce more – without increasing your input
Low noise separators – hearing is believing
Homogenizer buying guide – 6 things to know
Why Tetra Pak Homogenizers give you best value in the long run
Get ten years’ peace of mind with unique warranty
How a dairy saved €19,500 in annual energy costs